21. Ott MA mais aussi al., The newest trading-from anywhere between hormone contraceptives and condoms among adolescents, Point of views to your Sexual and you may Reproductive Wellness, 2002, 34(1):6–14.
twenty two. Wilson EK and you may Koo Horsepower, Associations anywhere between reasonable-money ladies relationship services in addition to their birth-control have fun with, Perspectives with the Sexual and you may Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC et al., Relatives and buddy intimacy in order to adolescent sexual couples inside relationship to condom fool around with, Record out-of Adolescent Fitness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA ainsi que al., The latest developmental relationship from dating top quality, hormonal birth control solutions and condom https://kissbridesdate.com/greek-women/thessaloniki/ low-fool around with among adolescent women, Log out of Teenage Health, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty five. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational union and you may dangers so you’re able to relationships restoration requires: has an effect on to your condom explore, Diary away from American College Fitness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty seven. Manning WD mais aussi al., Young adult relationships relationship and also the handling of sexual chance, Population Look and Plan Review, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
28. Manlove J et al., Adolescent mothers for the foster care and attention: risk points and you will results for young people in addition to their pupils, Lookup Temporary, Washington, DC: Child Fashion, 2011.
30. DiClemente RJ mais aussi al., Sexual exposure routines associated with the with more mature sex lovers: an examination of black teenage ladies, Sexually Carried Disease 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty-two. Fortenberry JD ainsi que al., Condom fool around with just like the a function of time in brand new and based adolescent sexual dating, American Record out-of Personal Health, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Exposure and you may protective factors of this changeover so you’re able to an initial sexual reference to an adult mate, Log regarding Teenage Health, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Contraception explore models across teens’ sexual relationships, papers exhibited at the annual conference of your own Population Organization off America, Philadelphia, .
thirty-five. Manning WD, Giordano Pc and you will Longmore MA, Linking: the connection contexts regarding “nonrelationship” sex, Record off Adolescent Research, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
thirty-six. Carlson MJ and you can Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results from multiple-married fertility getting adult info and you will relationship, report exhibited in the annual fulfilling of one’s Connection to have Public Rules Studies and Government, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you will Graefe DR, Selecting a friend? This new relationship and you can cohabitation histories out of unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and you may Wolfe B, eds., Out-of Wedlock: Explanations and Consequences from Nonmarital Fertility, Nyc: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Emerging Answers 2007: Browse Results into the Software to reduce Teenager Pregnancy and Sexually Sent Sickness, Arizona, DC: Federal Strategy to cease Teenager and you will Unexpected Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The brand new impression off applications to improve birth prevention use certainly one of mature women: a glance at experimental and you will quasi-experimental knowledge, Views with the Sexual and you can Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Associations
Jennifer Manlove is system city director and you will senior lookup researcher, Kate Welti try look scientist, E Wildsmith was elderly lookup scientist and you may Megan Barry is actually search analyst, every in the Youngster Style, Bethesda, MD.
Record
In the 1st research, that used a neighbor hood-urban area try regarding adolescents inside the Ohio, Manning and associates 9 categorized relationship properties towards that directory of positive features (including romantic mind-disclosure, romantic like and you can relationships salience) plus one directory off negative properties (such dispute and you may nonexclusivity). They learned that large results into both list were of this smaller condom structure. Descriptive analyses together with suggested one to a mixture of high positive and you may high negative scores was on the less condom feel.
During the for every bullet, users were asked “As big date away from past interview, have you been inside a matchmaking relationships for which you consider out-of yourself as an element of two?” We experienced participants to settle an internet dating relationship whenever they answered yes assuming the partner is actually a recent dating mate, rather than a spouse, cohabiting companion otherwise previous partner. Same-sex relationship dating and people where the respondent got in past times cohabited on mate was indeed omitted. Total, cuatro,013 participants claimed a recently available relationships relationships throughout 2002–2005. Of your own left participants, 553 were not about test within the series of great interest, step 1,876 were cohabiting otherwise partnered, and you will 2,542 had no current relationships relationship. Participants within our test was indeed old 18–twenty-six.
Relationship commitment was according to a couple steps. The initial try an effective 0–10 measure where participants rated the likelihood that they and you will its mate was to each other into the 6 months. A rating of no shown no way; a great ten indicated 100% opportunities. I categorized so it possibilities while the lower (lower than 6), medium (6–9) or highest (10). With the second measure of connection, we integrated a varying to have whether the couple had talked about relationship or cohabitation; answers was in fact categorized because the discussed neither, discussed cohabitation or chatted about marriage. (Participants just who claimed with chatted about both cohabitation and you may relationship was in fact integrated in the wedding class.)
Heterogeneous birth-control consequences within this long run relationship may also help define straight down birth control surface inside the offered teenage relationship, even after higher probability of previously-access to contraceptives. thirty-two, 33 Earlier in the day research has interpreted this looking for of the positing you to definitely lovers are able to sporadically forgo birth-control use in more severe dating; thirty-two, 34 but not, our very own performance recommend that shorter contraception explore is concentrated into the long-emergency room label relationships characterized by highest dispute and lower partnership.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you will Pleck JH, The newest fictional character of young men’s room condom fool around with during and you will around the dating, Family members Believed Perspectives, 1994, 26(6):246–251.